Google Pixel 4 Vs Samsung S20
Samsung Milky way S20 vs Google Pixel four
VS
Here nosotros compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.ii-inch Samsung Galaxy S20 (with Exynos 9 Octa 990) that was released on Feb 11, 2020, against the Google Pixel 4, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 and came out 4 months before. On this page, y'all will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Bombardment life
- Camera
- Comments
Primal differences
An overview of the chief advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S20
- Comes with 1200 mAh larger battery capacity: 4000 vs 2800 mAh
- Delivers 86% higher peek brightness (811 against 437 nits)
- Shows 32% longer bombardment life (24:28 vs 18:36 hours)
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- 27% college pixel density (563 vs 444 PPI)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi half dozen wireless networks
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1000GB
- Thinner bezels – 9.7% more screen real estate
- Has a 0.5 inch larger screen size
- Fingerprint scanner
- Slow-motility recording at 960FPS
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel four
- The rear photographic camera has a 2x optical zoom
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Functioning
CPU/GPU operation in apps and games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Photographic camera
Photograph and video recording quality
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview score
Final comparison evaluation
Value for money
Yous can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a amend value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison tabular array of technical specifications and tests
Display
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | POLED |
| Size | 6.2 inches | five.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 10 3200 pixels | 1080 10 2280 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | xix:nine |
| PPI | 563 ppi | 444 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | xc Hz |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Aye, HDR10+ | Aye, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Screen-to-torso ratio | 89.5% | 79.8% |
| Brandish features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Brandish | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 95.5% |
| PWM | 242 Hz | 367 Hz |
| Response time | 8.5 ms | 2.four ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Top brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]
Blueprint and build
| Pinnacle | 151.seven mm (5.97 inches) | 147.one mm (5.79 inches) |
| Width | 69.1 mm (2.72 inches) | 68.8 mm (2.71 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.nine mm (0.31 inches) | viii.two mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 163 gramm (5.75 oz) | 162 gramm (5.71 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metallic |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Cerise | White, Black, Orangish |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yeah, in-display | No |
Performance
Tests of Samsung Galaxy S20 and Google Pixel four in the benchmarks
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos nine Octa 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| Max. clock | 2700 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + ii + 4) | viii (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at ii.5 GHz: Cortex-A76 - 2 cores at ii.73 GHz: Exynos M5 | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silvery) - iii cores at ii.42 GHz: Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gilt) - i cadre at ii.84 GHz: Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) |
| L3 enshroud | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Lithography procedure | vii nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Graphics | Mali-G77 MP11 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU clock | 550 MHz | 585 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1196 GFLOPS | ~899 GFLOPS |
| RAM size | viii GB | 6 GB |
| Memory blazon | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | ii | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 64, 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS iii.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Retention card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max. size | Up to 1000 GB | - |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
| CPU | 151215 | 129834 |
| GPU | 230621 | 182353 |
| Memory | 81673 | 67946 |
| UX | 121126 | 107998 |
| Total score | 579116 | 487005 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 42% | 79% |
| Graphics exam | 25 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4215 | 3040 |
| PCMark 3.0 score | 10945 | 10739 |
Software
| Operating organization | Android x.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) | Android x (Can exist upgraded to Android 12) |
| ROM | 1 UI 4.i | - |
| Os size | twenty.ane GB | 9.55 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 4000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Charge ability | 25 Due west | 18 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes (11 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (100% in 75 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:15 hr | 1:20 hr |
| Web browsing | 08:40 hr | 06:04 hr |
| Watching video | ten:04 hr | 08:41 hr |
| Gaming | 04:fifteen hour | 03:09 hr |
| Standby | 83 hr | 62 hr |
Camera
Specs and photographic camera test of smartphones
| Matrix | 12 megapixels | 12.2 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Zoom | Optical, i.1x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Wearisome motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 119° |
| Lenses | 3 (12 MP + 64 MP + 12 MP) | 2 (12.2 MP + sixteen MP) |
| Broad (main) lens | - 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.viii - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1.8 micron - Sensor: 1/one.76", Samsung S5K2LD (ISOCELL CMOS) - Stage autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization | - 12.two MP - Aperture: f/1.7 - Focal length: 28 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55", Sony IMX363 (BSI CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization |
| Telephoto lens | - 64 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.72", Samsung Bright S5KGW2 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization | - 16 MP - Aperture: f/two.4 - Focal length: 45 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/3.09", Sony IMX481 (BSI CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
| Ultra-wide lens | - 12 MP - Discontinuity: f/2.two - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: one.iv micron - Sensor: ane/ii.55", Samsung S5K2LA (ISOCELL CMOS) | - |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support | - Bokeh mode - Pro style - RAW support |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Google Pixel iv from DxOMark |
| Megapixels | 10 megapixels | eight megapixels |
| Image resolution | 2592 x 3872 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/ii.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 22 mm |
| Pixel size | 1.22 microns | ane.22 microns |
| Sensor blazon | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | i/3.two" | - |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Total HD) at xxx FPS |
DxOMark camera tests
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi half dozen (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/northward/air conditioning) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Directly - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Brandish |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Blazon-C | USB Blazon-C |
| USB version | iii.1 | 3.i |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Blazon of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| LTE Cat* | 22 | 18 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone sound jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yeah | Yes |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2020 | October 2019 |
| Release engagement | March 2020 | November 2019 |
| SAR (caput) | 0.28 Due west/kg | 1.19 W/kg |
| SAR (trunk) | ane.52 W/kg | one.39 Due west/kg |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Confront recognition sensor |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs tin be unlike depending on the state.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S20 is definitely a ameliorate purchase.
Cast your vote
And then, which phone would you choose?
Full votes: 26
Related comparisons
You can share your stance or ask a question in the comments below
Source: https://nanoreview.net/en/phone-compare/samsung-galaxy-s20-vs-google-pixel-4
0 Response to "Google Pixel 4 Vs Samsung S20"
Post a Comment